[winswitch] [ANNOUNCE] xpra 0.3.0

[Antoine Martin]

On 22/05/12 22:21, Neal Becker wrote:
> I do not recommend using atrpms.  This will often cause nasty conflicts.
>
> Use rpmfusion.  And then use x264-devel (not libx264...)
Depending on a "-devel" package for a binary library feels wrong!
It's a shame RPMs cannot have dependencies on "X or Y"...
> Also, I needed a couple patches to build from srpm
>
> Basically, change build to:
>
> %build
> cd parti-all-%{version}
> rm -rf build install
> python make_constants_pxi.py wimpiggy/lowlevel/constants.txt
> wimpiggy/lowlevel/constants.pxi
> python setup.py build
You've dropped the:
CFLAGS=-O0
Is that intentional/needed?

I was going to make this the default for future releases after some more
thorough testing.
I am a bit reluctant to do this now...

Cheers
Antoine

>
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Antoine Martin <antoine at nagafix.co.uk>wrote:
>
>>  On 22/05/12 21:37, Neal Becker wrote:
>>
>> On fedora, need also:
>>
>> yum install x264-devel ffmpeg-devel
>>
>>
>>  The development instructions have this info here:
>> https://xpra.org/dev.html#fedora
>>
>> What I had missed was that on Fedora the binary RPMs needed to depend on
>> "libx264_118" and not "libx264"...
>> I have just re-spun them with the fix, you can grab the new 0.3.0-2 binary
>> RPMs from here:
>> http://xpra.org/dists/Fedora/
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Antoine
>>