From ngrcld at gmail.com  Sat Jan  7 13:28:03 2023
From: ngrcld at gmail.com (Claudio Negri)
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2023 14:28:03 +0100
Subject: [winswitch] warning "network performance issue" with xpra
 4.4.2-r0
In-Reply-To: <CAHSm11=ZjpVQ3X3y_G3fo=x1JY2We6L5vt8HebdW4EWsG5LMHg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHSm11=ZjpVQ3X3y_G3fo=x1JY2We6L5vt8HebdW4EWsG5LMHg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHSm11kiLOUMKj=nFzbHjgAhvU_Mherbut684D4WiirG8VoWew@mail.gmail.com>

Upgraded to xpra 4.4.3-r0: now the warning message appears more rarely.

I think --bandwidth-limit option does't work correctly: checking Session
Info -> Graphs, I see "recv" going up to 7Mbit/s (when I set
--bandwidth-limit=1Mbps)

Thanks,
Claudio

Il giorno dom 27 nov 2022 alle ore 16:17 Claudio Negri <ngrcld at gmail.com>
ha scritto:

> Hi,
> I just installed xpra 4.4.2-r0, same version on:
> server: Ubuntu 22.10 (kinetic)
> client: Windows 10
>
> I know I have a bad network connection between client and server, but xpra
> is usable.
>
> I run it with the following command:
> xpra.exe start-desktop ssh://root at test.it:8426/10
> --resize-display=1280x800 --start-child=xfce4-session
> --exit-with-children=yes --video-encoders=none --auto-refresh-delay=1
> --min-quality=70 --bandwidth-limit=1Mbps
>
> My problem is a warning message that often appears in Windows, that says:
> ---
> Network Performance Issue
> -
> Your network connection is struggling to keep up,
> consider lowering the bandwidth limit,
> or turning off automatic network congestion management.
> Choosing 'ignore' will silence all further warnings.
> ---
>
> The message is shown in the lower right corner, likely the 'ignore' button
> is outside the monitor, because I can't see it.
>
> I think the bandwidth limit is ok: rarely the network il slower than 1Mbps.
>
> I would like to ask:
> 1) how can I turn off automatic network congestion management? I have
> found nothing in the manual
> 2) can I disable that warning from command line?
> 3) you have some suggestion to improve the connection (different
> parameters, or something other)?
>
> Thanks,
> Claudio
>