[winswitch] why is winswitch repo packaging Cython??
totaam at gmail.com
Wed Aug 20 13:52:41 BST 2014
Sure, that would be reasonable.
The downside would be that the repo would no longer contain everything
needed for building xpra exactly as delivered.
Another option would be to provide two repositories, one with the complete
build toolchain, the other with just the minimum required for installing
Either way, it looks like I will have to spend more time on packaging
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Neal Becker <ndbecker2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Would it be reasonable to provide only centos packages, not fedora
> packages, which should already be provided in standard fedora repo?
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:17 AM, Antoine Martin <antoine at nagafix.co.uk>
> > On 19/08/14 18:06, Neal Becker wrote:
> > > I just noticed I have an update for Cython (fedora 20)
> > >
> > > Why would winswitch package Cython?
> > >
> > > Just to increase my surprise, I maintain Cython for Fedora. I also
> > > noticed Fedora Cython package is about 9M, which winswitch version
> > > is 2M.
> > Never mind, I've just remembered why that is (I did that)
> > http://xpra.org/trac/changeset/7060/xpra
> > We don't want any external dependencies like EPEL.
> > Just vanilla CentOS / Fedora systems as base.
> > Antoine
> > _______________________________________________
> > shifter-users mailing list
> > shifter-users at lists.devloop.org.uk
> > http://lists.devloop.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/shifter-users
> shifter-users mailing list
> shifter-users at lists.devloop.org.uk
More information about the shifter-users